[debian-devel:11428] Re: RFC: moving busybox into its own .deb

[Taketoshi Sano <kgh12351@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

佐野＠浜松です。

 boot-floppies の開発についてですが、

In <20000115105446.A1189@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
 at Sat, 15 Jan 2000 10:54:46 -0700,
 on RFC: moving busybox into its own .deb,
  Erik Andersen <andersen@xxxxxxxxxxxx> さん writes:

> I've been having a bit of difficulty managing busybox
> for the boot floppies.  
> 
> At the moment, I have my own busybox CVS source tree where I do primary
> development, and where I apply and test patches sent to me, and generally
> add/develop/break stuff.  In addition, there is also the boot-floppies CVS
> source tree, to which contributions are added fairly regularly (which is a good
> thing, and makes both the boot-floppies and busybox better).  However, this is
> also a real pain.
> 
> When I make changes to my CVS tree, I have to manually merge the changes into
> the boot-floppies tree.   When folks add changes to the boot-floppies tree, I
> have to manually merge those changes back into my local CVS tree.  And in the
> process, of cource, things like $Id fields always get screwed up.
> 
> I'd like to get some comments on my splitting busybox out from the
> boot-floppies tree, and instead being provided by a .deb (just like ash, the
> kernel, and several of the other tools).  If I go ahead and split it out into a
> .deb, is this the type of change that would have to wait till after the potato
> release?
> 
>  -Erik
> 
> --
> Erik B. Andersen   Web:    http://www.xmission.com/~andersen/ 
>                    email:  andersee@debian.org
> --This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--

というメールが流れていたので、utilities/busybox/ の下をいじる時は
直接 CVS に commit せず、Erik Andersen にメールを投げるほうが
いいかもしれません。

FYI.

--
     ＃ (わたしのおうちは浜松市、「夜のお菓子」で有名さ。)
    <kgh12351@xxxxxxxxxxx> : Taketoshi Sano (佐野　武俊)