[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debian-devel:14606] Re: optional or extra?

From: Fumitoshi UKAI <ukai@debian.or.jp>
Subject: [debian-devel:14606] Re: optional or extra?
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 01:10:07 +0900
Organization: Debian JP Project
X-ml-info: If you have a question, send e-mail with the body "help" (without quotes) to the address debian-devel-ctl@debian.or.jp; help=<mailto:debian-devel-ctl@debian.or.jp?body=help>
X-ml-name: debian-devel
X-mlserver: fml [fml 3.0pl#17]; post only (only members can post)
References: <20011010081002E.kohda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Message-id: <87ofneb1om.wl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
X-mail-count: 14606
User-agent: Wanderlust/2.6.0 (Twist And Shout) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.3 (Unebigory�mae) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.0.104 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)

At Wed, 10 Oct 2001 08:05:43 +0900,
Atsuhito Kohda wrote:

> とあり lynx (standard) と conflict してるので extra 
> かな，と思ったのですがどうなんでしょうか？

extra が正しいですね。
lynx-cur, lynx-cur-wrapper, lynx-ja, lynx-ja-wrapper は extra にしときます。

-- 
鵜飼文敏

Follow-Ups:
- [debian-devel:14607] Re: optional or extra?
  - From: Atsuhito Kohda

References:
- [debian-devel:14601] optional or extra?
  - From: Atsuhito Kohda

Prev by Date: [debian-devel:14605] Re: Can't start X in sid
Next by Date: [debian-devel:14607] Re: optional or extra?
Previous by thread: [debian-devel:14601] optional or extra?
Next by thread: [debian-devel:14607] Re: optional or extra?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread