[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[debian-devel:07306] Re: Intent to package lyx-ja
香田です。メンテナンス希望者は？
From: Kikutani Makoto <kikutani@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [debian-devel:07297] Re: Intent to package lyx-ja
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 1999 00:09:46 +0900
> > TeX ベースの wysiwyg なワープロソフト lyx の日本語化
> > があるのを NetNews で知ったのでパッケージ化を考えて
>
> 欲しいです。このあいだ1.0を持ってきてmakeしたけど、
> ソースがでかいからたいへんだった。
菊谷さんの記事で知りました。確かにデカイ。
> > lyx-0.12.0.jp-patch.tar.gz was downloaded from
> > <http://cgi.din.or.jp/~kawakami/LyX/index.html>
>
> いつのまにか、1.0用の日本語化キットが出ている...
うっ、ひょっとして lyx って活発に開発されてるのですか。
めったにバージョンアップなど無いと思ってたのですが。
まだ本家の potato が 0.12.0.final なのがちょっと困る
けど。(手抜きできない(^^；)
> これ、本家ではxformsの関係でnon-freeだったような気もするけど
> 今ネットが遅くて確認できない。
はい、これは contrib になるようです。でも 1.0.0 の
copyright (下記参照)はひょっとして main への道？
---------------------------------
While LyX has been released nominally under the GPL in the past, it
has in fact never been truly GPL. Particularly, it has always been
linked to a closed source library. While some have taken a view that
such actions violate the GPL, this is a legal impossibility. The law
is quite clear that the release of the software by the original authors
and copyright holders changed the licenses.
Rather than leaving the issue to be debated, the following
clarifications are given. This is *not* a change of license, but a
clarification of the license that LyX has always used. All patches
submitted to LyX fall under this same license.
1) LyX is quasi-GPL software. The terms of the GPL apply save where
they conflict with this statement.
2) There is no limitation on the license or nature of any software,
source, binary, library, or other, that may be linked to LyX, or to
which LyX may be linked. Particularly, the second full paragraph of
section 2, from 'These requirements apply to the modified work'
through 'who wrote it.' is rejected in its entirety.
3) There is no limitation on combining LyX source code with code
subject to any other license, provided that the LyX source remains
under this same license. Particularly, Section 3 of the GPL is
rejected in its entirety. To redistribute a modified version of LyX,
the entire source code of the modified LyX must be made available under
the terms of this license or such other licenses as apply to portions
of the original or modified code.
4) Any other clause or interpretation of the GPL limiting the
combination of other software of any type and LyX is rejected in its
entirety, provided that the LyX code and modifications to the LyX
source code remains under this same license, or such other licenses as
apply to portions of the original or modified code.
5) Nothing in this statement purports to alter or interpret the
license of any other software. Any combination of other software with
LyX must also meet the requirements of that software.
---------------------------------
> > います。他に予定がある方が居れば遠慮したいと思います
> > ので一応お知らせです。
こんなのあるよメールで、これが主眼だったのですがどなたか
やりません？
From: Masayuki Hatta <masayuki-h@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [debian-devel:07298] Re: Intent to package lyx-ja
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 1999 00:21:29 +0900
> 八田(ま)です。
>
> わーい、ワープロだ！GPL だ！
>
> これ、LaTeX で出力されるやつですよね。
というと正確ではないかもわかりませんが、大体そう
思ってます。(実はまだ良く知らない(^^；)
平成１１年２月１５日(月)
--
***************************
香田 温人（こうだ あつひと）
http://www1.pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp/%7Ekohda/