[debian-devel:18333] Re: RFS: hyperestraier

[Hideki Yamane <henrich@debian.or.jp>]

　やまねです。

On Thu, 5 Jul 2012 03:25:24 +0900
Hideki Yamane <henrich@debian.or.jp> wrote:
> 　先ほど確認してアップロードしました。

　section の情報がサーバーとパッケージで食い違っていて、override が必要な様なので、
　BTS しておいて頂けますか＞倉敷さん


There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):

libestraier-ruby-doc_1.4.13-5_all.deb: package says section is oldlibs, override says doc.
libestraier-ruby-doc_1.4.13-5_all.deb: package says priority is extra, override says optional.
libestraier-ruby1.8_1.4.13-5_amd64.deb: package says section is oldlibs, override says ruby.
libestraier-ruby1.8_1.4.13-5_amd64.deb: package says priority is extra, override says optional.
libestraier-ruby1.9.1_1.4.13-5_amd64.deb: package says section is oldlibs, override says ruby.
libestraier-ruby1.9.1_1.4.13-5_amd64.deb: package says priority is extra, override says optional.
libestraier-ruby_1.4.13-5_amd64.deb: package says section is oldlibs, override says ruby.
libestraier-ruby_1.4.13-5_amd64.deb: package says priority is extra, override says optional.


Please note that a list of new sections were recently added to the
archive: cli-mono, database, debug, fonts, gnu-r, gnustep, haskell,
httpd, java, kernel, lisp, localization, ocaml, php, ruby, vcs, video,
xfce, zope.  At this time a script was used to reclassify packages into
these sections.  If this is the case, please only reply to this email if
the new section is inappropriate, otherwise please update your package
at the next upload.

Either the package or the override file is incorrect.  If you think
the override is correct and the package wrong please fix the package
so that this disparity is fixed in the next upload.  If you feel the
override is incorrect then please file a bug against ftp.debian.org and
explain why. Please INCLUDE the list of packages as seen above, or we
won't be able to deal with your request due to missing information.

Please make sure that the subject of the bug you file follows the
following format:

Subject: override: BINARY1:section/priority, [...], BINARYX:section/priority

Include the justification for the change in the body of the mail please.

-- 
Regards,

 Hideki Yamane     henrich @ debian.or.jp/org
 http://wiki.debian.org/HidekiYamane