[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debian-devel:10422] Re: Bug#45318: PROPOSAL] Ammend contrib definition



佐野@浜松です。

そういや、こんなのもあったっけ。

In article <19990917191850.A14332@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
 edward@debian.org (Edward Betts) さん writes:

> [1  <text/plain; us-ascii (quoted-printable)>]
> Anthony Towns <aj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > ] 2.1.3. The contrib section
> > ] --------------------------
> > ] 
> > ]      Every package in "contrib" must comply with the DFSG.
> > ] 
> > ]      Examples of packages which would be included in "contrib" are
> > ]         * free packages which require "contrib", "non-free", or "non-US"
> > ]           packages or packages which are not in our archive at all for
> > ]           compilation or execution, and
> > ]         * wrapper packages or other sorts of free accessories for non-free
> > ]           programs.
> > 
> > That is, that the only consideration about whether a package should be
> > added to main, contrib or non-free be its licensing terms.
> > 
> > Packages that are `too buggy to support' or `fail to meet policy
> > requirements in a serious way' should either be fixed (ideally), or not
> > included in Debian at all.
> 
> I second this.

 "too buggy to support" とか "fail to meet policy requirements
 in a serious way" とかのパッケージは fixed されるまで Debian に
収録されないことになりそうですね。

-- 
     #わたしのおうちは浜松市、「夜のお菓子」で有名さ。
    <xlj06203@xxxxxxxxxxx> : Taketoshi Sano (佐野 武俊)