[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[debian-devel:14484] Re: potato -> woody and locale-{ja,ko,zh,vi}

From: Taketoshi Sano <kgh12351@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [debian-devel:14484] Re: potato -> woody and locale-{ja,ko,zh,vi}
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2001 04:38:23 +0900
X-dispatcher: imput version 991025(IM133)
X-fingerprint: A1A0 F2D0 9C5D 7D61 DBA1 1507 D0B3 F3D0 AE31 C009
X-ml-info: If you have a question, send e-mail with the body "help" (without quotes) to the address debian-devel-ctl@debian.or.jp; help=<mailto:debian-devel-ctl@debian.or.jp?body=help>
X-ml-name: debian-devel
X-mlserver: fml [fml 3.0pl#17]; post only (only members can post)
References: <87lml1ceqf.wl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20010804012626I.ishikawa@xxxxxxxxxxx> <wtwhevpj6j7.wl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <87ae1gvdub.wl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <wtwn15fd87e.wl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <874rrns6es.wl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <E15TF24-0002Yi-00@auric.debian.org> <20010805043145.331FA35484@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Message-id: <y5ahevi1s5p.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
X-mail-count: 14484
User-agent: Semi-gnus/6.10.12 SEMI/1.12.1 ([JR] Nonoichi) FLIM/1.12.7 (Y�zaki) Emacs/20.7 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/4.0 (HANANOEN)

佐野＠浜松です。

In <20010805043145.331FA35484@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
  on "Sun, 5 Aug 2001 13:31:46 +0900',
   with "[debian-devel:14466] Re: potato -> woody and locale-{ja,ko,zh,vi}",
 akira yamada <akira@xxxxxxxxxxx> さん wrote:

> Sun, 5 Aug 2001 12:57:04 +0900 頃の
>    Mail-Count: 14465
>       Subject: [debian-devel:14465] Re: potato -> woody and locale-{ja,ko,zh,vi}   
> についてのお話にて Junichi Uekawa さん曰く… 
> (J == Junichi Uekawa <dancer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> さん)
> 
> ちょっとよくわからなかったのですが
> 
> In article 14465, <E15TF24-0002Yi-00@auric.debian.org>
> J> 将来にわたってlibcに，Conflicts:, Replaces:, Provides: を
> J> 追加するよりも，locale-* を空のパッケージにしたほうが良いように思われます．
> 
> どうして後者の方が良いのでしょう?

なんだったかなぁ。何かの件で Ben C. がそういうこと
 (「将来にわたって過去のパッケージに対する依存関係を
    設定し続けるのは有害だ」) という主張をしていた
   ような気が。

あれ、それとも Ben C じゃなかったかな ? JoeyH か ?

依存関係がやたらと増え過ぎるとパッケージ管理が必要以上に
面倒になる、とかそういう理由だったような。

理由にならないような理由に思えるかもしれませんが、以前に
どこかでそういう主張を見かけたような気がします。

 (私がそういう主張に同意しているというわけではありません。念のため。)

と、思ったら、既に devel@Org で Ben C も賛成のメールを
送ってるみたいですね。取り越し苦労だったか。

-- 
    <kgh12351@xxxxxxxxxxx> : Taketoshi Sano (佐野　武俊)

Follow-Ups:
- [debian-devel:14485] Re: potato -> woody and locale-{ja,ko,zh,vi}
  - From: Tomohiro KUBOTA

References:
- [debian-devel:14457] potato -> woody and locale-{ja,ko,zh,vi}
  - From: Tomohiro KUBOTA
- [debian-devel:14458] Re: potato -> woody and locale-{ja,ko,zh,vi}
  - From: ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
- [debian-devel:14459] Re: potato -> woody and locale-{ja,ko,zh,vi}
  - From: GOTO Masanori
- [debian-devel:14460] Re: potato -> woody and locale-{ja,ko,zh,vi}
  - From: Tomohiro KUBOTA
- [debian-devel:14462] Re: potato -> woody and locale-{ja,ko,zh,vi}
  - From: GOTO Masanori
- [debian-devel:14463] Re: potato -> woody and locale-{ja,ko,zh,vi}
  - From: Tomohiro KUBOTA
- [debian-devel:14465] Re: potato -> woody and locale-{ja,ko,zh,vi}
  - From: Junichi Uekawa
- [debian-devel:14466] Re: potato -> woody and locale-{ja,ko,zh,vi}
  - From: akira yamada

Prev by Date: [debian-devel:14482] Re: groff Japanese support breaks PS output for latin2
Next by Date: [debian-devel:14483] Re: doc-base での Section 。
Previous by thread: [debian-devel:14466] Re: potato -> woody and locale-{ja,ko,zh,vi}
Next by thread: [debian-devel:14485] Re: potato -> woody and locale-{ja,ko,zh,vi}
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread